Influence of exchange and shielding on collisional entanglement fidelity in strong quantum recoil semiconductor plasmas

Authors

  • Gyeong Won Lee Hanyang University, South Korea
  • Young-Dae Jung Hanyang University, South Korea

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26577/phst-2014-1-18
        38 19

Keywords:

strong quantum recoil semiconductor plasmas, exchange effect, entanglement fidelity.

Abstract

The electron-exchange and shielding on the entanglement fidelity for the elastic electron-ion collision is investigated in strong quantum recoil semiconductor plasmas. The effective Shukla-Eliasson potential and the partial wave method are employed to obtain the collisional entanglement fidelity as a function of the electron-exchange parameter, collision energy, Fermi energy, and plasmon energy. The result shows that the influence of electron-exchange suppresses the transmission of quantum information in strong quantum recoil semiconductor plasmas. It is also found that the collisional entanglement fidelity decreases with an increase of the Fermi energy. Additionally, the collisional entanglement fidelity increases with increasing plasmon energy.

References

[1] Mishima K., Hayashi M. and Lin S. H. Entanglement in scattering processes // Phys. Lett. A. – 2004. – Vol. 333. – P. 371-377.
[2] Shin D.-S. and Jung Y.-D. Nonthermal effects on the entanglement fidelity for elastic scatterings in Lorentzian plasmas // Phys. Lett. A. – 2008. – Vol. 372. – P. 5458-5461.
[3] Cohen-Tannoudji C. and Guery-Odelin D. Advances in Atomic Physics. – NJ: World Scientific, 2011. – 796 p.
[4] Weinberg S. Lectures on Quantum mechanics. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013. – 375p.
[5] Jung Y.-D. and Hong W.-P. Influence of the ion wake-field on the collisional entanglement fidelity in complex dusty plasmas // Phys. Plasmas. – 2012. – Vol. 19. – P. 034502.
[6] Shevelko V.P. Atoms and Their Spectroscopic Properties. – Berlin: Springer, 1997. – 247 p.
[7] Ramazanov T.S. and Dzhumagulova K.N. Effective screened potentials of strongly coupled semiclassical plasma // Phys. Plasmas. – 2002. – Vol. 9. – P. 3758-3761.
[8] Ramazanov T.S. and Turekhanova K.N. Runaway electrons in a fully and partially ionized nonideal plasma // Phys. Plasmas. – 2005. – Vol. 12. – P. 102502.
[9] Shevelko V.P. and Tawara H. Atomic Processes in Basic and Applied Physics. – Heidelberg: Springer, 2012. – 495 p.
[10] Baimbetov F.B., Nurekenov Kh.T. and Ramazanov T.S. Shielding of a slowly moving test charge in a quantum plasma // Phys. Lett. A. – 1995. – Vol. 202. – P. 211-214.
[11] Ramazanov T.S., Dzhumagulova K.N., and Omarbakiyeva Y.A. Effective polarization interaction potential “charge-atom” for partially ionized dense plasma // Phys. Plasmas. – 2005. – Vol. 12. – P. 092702.
[12] Shukla P.K., Stenflo L. and Bingham R. Shielding of a slowly moving test charge in a quantum plasma // Phys. Lett. A. – 2006. – Vol. 359. – P. 218-219.
[13] Shukla P.K. and Stenflo L. Stimulated scattering instabilities of electromagnetic waves in an ultracold quantum plasma // Phys. Plasmas. – 2006. – Vol. 13. – P. 044505.
[14] Marklund M. and Shukla P.K. Nonlinear collective effects in photon-photon and photon-plasma interactions // Rev. Mod. Phys. – 2006. – Vol. 78. – P. 591- 640.
[15] Ren H., Wu Z. and Chu P.K. Dispersion of linear waves in quantum plasmas // Phys. Plasmas. – 2007. – Vol. 14. – P. 062102.
[16] Shukla P.K. and Eliasson B. Screening and wake potentials of a test charge in quantum plasmas // Phys. Letts. A. – 2008. – Vol. 372. – P. 2897-2899.
[17] Ramazanov T.S., Dzhumagulova K.N. and Gabdullin M.T. Effective potentials for ion-ion and charge-atom interactions of dense semiclassical plasma // Phys. Plasmas. – 2010. – Vol. 17. – P. 042703.
[18] Haas F. Quantum Plasmas. – NY: Springer, 2011. – Vol. 65. – Chap. 3. – P. 39-63.
[19] Shukla P.K. and Eliasson B. Colloquium: Nonlinear collective interactions in quantum plasmas with degenerate electron fluids // Rev. Mod. Phys. – 2011. – Vol. 83. – P. 885-906.
[20] Shukla P.K. and Eliasson B. Novel Attractive Force between Ions in Quantum Plasmas // Phys. Rev. Letts. – 2012. – Vol. 108. – P. 165007.
[21] Akbari-Moghanjoughi M. Shukla–Eliasson attractive force: Revisited // J. Plasma Phys. – 2013. – Vol. 79. – P. 189-196.
[22] Geltman S. Topics in Atomic Collision Theory. – NY: Academic Press, 1969. – 247 p.
[23] Hong W.-P. and Jung Y.-D. Electron-exchange and quantum screening effects on the collisional entanglement fidelity in degenerate quantum plasmas // Phys. Scr. – 2014. – Vol. 89. – P. 065601.
[24] Dzhumagulova K.N., Ramazanov T.S., and Masheeva R.U. Diffusion coefficient of three-dimensional Yukawa liquids // Phys. Plasmas. – 2013. – Vol. 20. – P. 113702.

Downloads

How to Cite

Won Lee, G., & Jung, Y.-D. (2015). Influence of exchange and shielding on collisional entanglement fidelity in strong quantum recoil semiconductor plasmas. Physical Sciences and Technology, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.26577/phst-2014-1-18

Issue

Section

Plasma Physics and Related Technology